NoDQ.com > Columns > One Count Kickout - Let Them Eat Raw
Posted by Steven Pacheco on 05/17/2012 at 07:04 PM
Like The One Count Kickout on Facebook!
The news is all over every site already. WWE has announced that beginning with it's 1000th episode of Monday Night Raw, airing on July 23rd, Monday Night Raw will permanently switch to a three hour format. Yes, Gilligan, a three hour format.
You've got to hand it to Vince McMahon. When demand for his show is slowly sinking, and ratings are mirroring an arythmic heart, he has found the solution: More is more! For all that 12-17 demographic whose attention they can't hold with a two hour show, add in another hour. If there's anything people love, it's three hour television shows.
Facietiousness aside, this could end up being one of the best or one of the worst decisions WWE has made in recent years. Of course there is the argument that moving to three hours was one of the major factors that led to the downfall of WCW, but WCW seriously lacked the ability to support a three hour show and showed no backstage organization in preparation for it. Though we often hear about WWE changing plans the day of the show, it's rare that Raw looks chaotic and confused like Nitro used to. Ultimately, three hours of Nitro was a drop in the bucket of what was a flooding disaster.
What good could come out of this, you might ask? Well, for one thing, maybe WWE can finally manifest Divas matches that last more than a minute on Raw. Doubtful, as they seem to care as much about the Diva division as I care about Hornswoggle. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to see Divas matches get an entire two minutes in the future! Wouldn't that be something. Eight moves instead of four... seriously, though, giving more time to the divas is one thing on a long list of things they should be able to do.
In addition to increasing time for the women, perhaps we could get more wrestling over promos. These seems like a longshot, as there is a fear they'll want to get people watching so we'll get promo heavy moments at the beginning and end of each hour, as we typically do. Remember when wrestling shows used to open and close with wrestling matches? Wild idea.
More wrestling, more divas, what more could you want? More talent, perhaps. I'm not talking bringing back guys like Kevin Nash (sorry Kev,) but new, young, rising talent. Something fresh for the WWE. I wouldn't be opposed to them bringing in some established guys from TNA either, though I consider that doubtful (outside of Matt Morgan, at the moment.)
Granting themselves another hour could give WWE the time and space to make good choices and build a better show. Unfortunately, their track record has shown that three hour Raws are usually total disasters where the first hour is essentially useless. This doesn't mean it will be like that every week. Hopefully, they've got something better in mind.
An interesting thing to consider is the overall effect on the ratings. It seems likely that the first hour of the show will be the lowest, as it typically is during three hour Raws. That being the case, it's possible that the low rating for hour one could drag down the overall rating for the whole show, which won't look good for the WWE either.
Ultimately, I find it hard to wrap my head around this one. With attention faltering, ratings wavering and interest depleting, why make this move? Usually you supply a demand, you stock up when you're selling out. You don't fill your stock room with more and more of a product that less and less people are buying. Even Nitro went to three hours when they were commanding a massive audience, not when the people started turning away.
This is the same audience that swelled post-Wrestlemania with the entrance of Brock Lesnar, but returned to normal within a few weeks. WWE has the ability to pull those people back on occasions like this, they just can't seem to keep them. So.. three hours then?
I'd like to see this succeed and I'd like to see a lot of amazing things come out of this. New talent, more matches, a better quality show and an increased probability of success in WWE's future. Unfortunately, I'm not a look at the bright side type of person, especially when it pertains to WWE who have time and again show the prominent ability to take what is prophesied as great and turn it into total garbage.
So, it remains to be seen. In the end, it comes down to you, the fans, the people who are invested in this business and want to see it improve. Whether or not three hours of Raw keeps you wanting more, or pushes you away. At this point, the ratings remaining the same as they have been would be a success for an additional hour every week. If ratings begin to decrease, however, will WWE stick with it or pull the plug? Figuring that out is figuring out the mind of Vince McMahon and that takes much longer than three hours.
Like The One Count Kickout on Facebook!
Steven Pacheco's Plug
NoDQ.com - Online Entertainment
Click here to discuss this post
Fantasy booking Evolution vs. The Shield
Who was the leader of The Shield?
The John Report: WWE Smackdown Review 04/28/16
Jay's Ways - WWE Payback 2016 Preview
Finn Balor's Main Roster Call Up: What's Coming?
The X-Factor: My Payback 2016 preview
Why a Brand Split is not ‘Best for Business’
Roman Reigns is NOT John Cena
ViRTUE's RAGE: Wrestlers Need to Play Characters
The John Report: WWE Payback 2016 Preview